This week’s reading gave a different perspective on the
revivals of the early 19th century than those we have read thus far;
a female perspective. As the revivalist
movements saw greater female numbers than male and – as we saw in A Shopkeeper’s Millennium – women played
an important role in the growth of the revival and revivalist social policies, reading
female accounts of the revivals provide an additional critical element to the
conversation.
Most of what I heard in the female account was not
surprising. These women were independent,
dedicated to their evangelical faith, and willing to step out of social and
cultural norms for the furtherance of the revival. Religion for these evangelicals was as much
about experience as it was about orthodoxy.
The experiential nature of evangelical faith is what stood out to me most
in these readings. The words of Foote,
Lee, and Stearns were raw and full of emotion.
They had experienced religion and they were not afraid to place their
most personal moments into the public – at least Christian public – sphere. Foote and Lee especially lean heavily – almost
solely – on experience in their arguments for female preaching.
At times in this week’s readings it seemed that experience
was all that mattered in these revivals.
In modern evangelicalism Biblicism is a key element and check against
experience. What were the checks against
experience in the 19th century evangelical church? Did Foote and Lee’s contemporaries also use
theological and Biblical arguments for female ministry in addition to
experience?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.